When lawyers fail, word spreads quickly. In the case of Elizabeth J. Barrett of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, the public has already delivered its verdict through Google Reviews. As of 13 September 2025, Barrett’s practice sits at a humiliating 2.1 out of 5 stars across 19 reviews. The words chosen by her past clients and contacts are not the gripes of a few malcontents—they are a chorus of condemnation, consistent in their accusations and brutal in their detail.
Evidence Fabrication and Dishonesty
One reviewer, Michael Williams, captures the heart of the allegations:
“Ms Barrett makes up evidence in cases. This might work in the short term, in the long term causes serious problems for your case. Moreover, she cuts legal corners, does not understand service of process laws which compromises personal rights.”
That review dovetails directly with sworn court filings accusing Barrett of fabricating emails, screenshots, and communications to mislead judges. It is not just bad lawyering—it is outright fraud, reported openly by a client on Google.
Another reviewer was even more blunt:
“Stay away. I had a horrible experience with her, got wrong advice and she actually lied to me.”
These are not casual words. Calling a lawyer a liar is among the most damning accusations a client can make—and here, it is repeated across multiple reviews.
Professional Incompetence
Several reviews highlight her complete lack of negotiation skill:
“Deplorable … needs to stop practising law and find another profession. Negotiating skills nonexistent.”
Others describe wrong advice, poor guidance, and outright malpractice. One client summarized their experience simply:
“Horrible.”
This isn’t about dissatisfaction with an outcome—this is a direct indictment of her competence as a lawyer.
Harassment and Abuse
Perhaps most disturbing are the accounts that Barrett continued harassing people even after being told to stop. One reviewer wrote:
“Absolutely horrible—kept calling and messaging me after I told her to stop.”
This matches broader allegations of a harassment campaign, where Barrett allegedly targeted not just clients but family members of her opponent in a family court case—sending hostile messages and threatening to show up at their homes.
Life-Destroying Conduct
The reviews grow even darker:
“This woman will destroy your life. I’ve unfortunately had to interact with her and she’s nothing but deplorable. She doesn’t keep her word, lies to you and over promises yet under delivers.”
Another:
“Unethical. I have a legal background and you’d never want to hire this person. My experience with her has been nothing but astonishing in how bad she’s been.”
And the most biting insult of all:
“You’d be better off hiring ChatGPT—it’d do about 500x better than this woman ever could offer. Shame on her.”
A Pattern Too Consistent to Ignore
These aren’t scattered complaints—they are dozens of voices saying the same thing: Elizabeth Barrett is dishonest, unethical, incompetent, and destructive. The reviews accuse her of:
-
Making up evidence.
-
Lying to clients.
-
Giving wrong legal advice.
-
Harassing people with unwanted calls and messages.
-
Failing basic negotiation and communication skills.
-
Acting unethically, with one review even reporting her to the state bar association.
The Takeaway
Elizabeth J. Barrett’s 2.1-star Google rating is more than a number—it is a flashing red siren. It warns prospective clients that hiring her could mean exposing yourself to lies, harassment, and catastrophic mishandling of your case.
Barrett has been called “deplorable,” “astonishingly bad,” and “life-destroying.” Reviewers are not advising caution—they are begging others to stay away.
⚠️ Consumer Warning: If you are considering legal counsel in Portsmouth, NH, the Google reviews alone should stop you in your tracks. Elizabeth J. Barrett is not just a poor choice; she is described by her own clients as a danger.
